"Design & Development: Magic Item Compendium"

General questions, debates, and rants about RPGs

Moderator: Moderators

Catharz
Knight-Baron
Posts: 893
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Re: "Design & Development: Magic Item Compendium"

Post by Catharz »

That buckler deal is probably best for archers. Nobody needs protection from ranged attacks like a ranged attacker.
Brobdingnagian
Knight
Posts: 493
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Re: "Design & Development: Magic Item Compendium"

Post by Brobdingnagian »

So, we've all agreed the Magic Item Compendium is, in fact, crap.

...

Are we going to do anything about it, or what?
Draco_Argentum
Duke
Posts: 2434
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Re: "Design & Development: Magic Item Compendium"

Post by Draco_Argentum »

I plan to read the book of gears, does that count?
RandomCasualty
Prince
Posts: 3506
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Re: "Design & Development: Magic Item Compendium"

Post by RandomCasualty »

Guest (Unregistered) at [unixtime wrote:1176656852[/unixtime]]White Raven Tactics specifically is a power that both changes your initiative and lets you act again in the same round if the new initiative is lower. As far as i can tell, it doesn't change, errata, update, or clarify the existing initiative rules.

So nice try, but changing your initiative order many times in a round won't give you extra actions. Even using White Raven tactics with the Magic Item Compendium enhancements won't get you more than one extra set of actions per round.


Why is that? As far as I can tell you simply get to act whenever your round happens to come up. So if you had some way of juggling your init around, then you should be able to act more than once if you did it right.

Though on a side note I tend to agree with this interpretation.

Frank wrote:
Either that or the enhancements don't do anything at all - because they only affect your initiative check and that only gets made once, and is checked before you are wielding or not wielding your dagger since you're out of combat.




User avatar
Cielingcat
Duke
Posts: 1453
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Re: "Design & Development: Magic Item Compendium"

Post by Cielingcat »

Brobdingnagian at [unixtime wrote:1176710455[/unixtime]]So, we've all agreed the Magic Item Compendium is, in fact, crap.

...

Are we going to do anything about it, or what?

I have not bought it, and I do not plan to.
CHICKENS ARE NOT SUPPOSED TO DO COCAINE, SILKY HEN
Josh_Kablack wrote:You are not a unique and precious snowflake, you are just one more fucking asshole on the internet who presumes themselves to be better than the unwashed masses.
User avatar
josephbt
Knight
Posts: 325
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm
Location: Zagreb, Cro

Re: "Design & Development: Magic Item Compendium"

Post by josephbt »

That's why knowing your RPG book dealer is good stuff. I always read the book before (not)buying it. I recomend you all do the same. Just get friendly with the local RPG store.
engi

Blood for the Blood God!
Catharz
Knight-Baron
Posts: 893
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Re: "Design & Development: Magic Item Compendium"

Post by Catharz »

Towards the end, the book all but says that stat boosters, natural AC, deflection AC, resistance saves, energy resistance, and armor bonuses should be part of the character rather than the equipment.

What it does say is that you should be able to add them to appropriately slotted items at no cost increase.
User avatar
NineInchNall
Duke
Posts: 1222
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Re: "Design & Development: Magic Item Compendium"

Post by NineInchNall »

What I want to know is how UMD works with runestaves. I'd imagine that it'd be under the "emulate class feature" clause, which would give our little Rogue infinite spells/day from a given runestaff.
Current pet peeves:
Misuse of "per se". It means "[in] itself", not "precisely". Learn English.
Malformed singular possessives. It's almost always supposed to be 's.
Catharz
Knight-Baron
Posts: 893
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Re: "Design & Development: Magic Item Compendium"

Post by Catharz »

NineInchNall at [unixtime wrote:1177358722[/unixtime]]What I want to know is how UMD works with runestaves. I'd imagine that it'd be under the "emulate class feature" clause, which would give our little Rogue infinite spells/day from a given runestaff.

You mean 3/spell/staff?
AlphaNerd
Master
Posts: 206
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Re: "Design & Development: Magic Item Compendium"

Post by AlphaNerd »

I have no idea how runestaves actually work, but presumably the argument goes "each time you emulate a class feature, it resets" or something like that. But I really have no idea.

I mean, can you pass a runestaff to someone else and have them use 3/day if you've already used yours?
User avatar
NineInchNall
Duke
Posts: 1222
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2008 7:54 pm

Re: "Design & Development: Magic Item Compendium"

Post by NineInchNall »

Ah, I didn't see the 3/day/spell limitation. That's cool, then. They're just less expensive staves for the standard Warlock to make. :)
Current pet peeves:
Misuse of "per se". It means "[in] itself", not "precisely". Learn English.
Malformed singular possessives. It's almost always supposed to be 's.
Post Reply